Evaluation | Effect | Average Age Sort descending | Observations | Experimental Evaluation | Country | Intervention |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Martins 2009 | -5 | N/A | 664,215 | No | Portugal | Teachers progression along payment scale conditional on performance |
Imberman 2012 | 14 | Grade 10 | 232,869 | No | United States | Teachers received awards based on yearly students learning |
Lavy 2009 | 0 | Grade 10 | 2,496 | No | Israel | Teachers were rewarded based on students pass rates and exam results |
Behrman 2012 ii | 4 | Grade 11 | 36,101 | Yes | Mexico | Teacher was rewarded or penalized based on her students achievement |
Behrman 2012 iii | 38 | Grade 11 | 36,101 | Yes | Mexico | Teachers and students were rewarded based on performance |
Marsh 2011 | -2 | Grade 5 | 121,741 | Yes | United States | Schools received awards for meeting annual performance targets |
Goodman 2010 | -2 | Grade 5 | 309 | Yes | United States | Schools received payments for meeting annual performance targets |
Fryer 2012 i | 16 | Grade 6 | 1,310 | Yes | United States | Teacher bonus based on own students scores, expected payment advanced |
Fryer 2012 ii | 23 | Grade 6 | 1,310 | Yes | United States | Teacher bonus based on own students scores |
Fryer 2012 iii | 36 | Grade 6 | 1,311 | Yes | United States | Teacher bonus based on group performance, expected payment advanced |
Fryer 2012 iv | 11 | Grade 6 | 1,311 | Yes | United States | Teacher bonus based on groups test scores |
Springer 2010 | 3 | Grade 7 | 12,311 | Yes | United States | Awards to teachers if their students improved on standardized tests |
Springer 2012 | 0 | Grade 7 | 3,827 | Yes | United States | Teachers received $5976-$6529 if their team was among the best third |
Fryer 2011 | -3 | Grade 9 | 205,958 | Yes | United States | Schools received payments for meeting annual performance targets |