Policy Challenge
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
Program Type
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
9
7
7
Firm Survival
Management Accounting Planning (eFS)
13
4
Evaluation Effect Average Age Observations Experimental Evaluation Country Intervention
Bulte 2017 13 43.77 2,649 Yes Vietnam Management + Accounting + Planning components trained
Fairlie 2015 8 42.08 2,308 Yes United States Management + Accounting + Planning components trained
Alibhai 2019 ii 4 35.84 1,113 Yes Ethiopia Management + Accounting + Planning components trained
del Mel 2014 -11 37.71 413 Yes Sri Lanka Management + Accounting + Planning components trained
Bruhn 2013 1 28.14 256 Yes Bosnia & Herzegovina Management + Accounting + Planning components trained
Klinger 2011 47 36.13 150 No El Salvador Management + Accounting + Planning components trained
Mano 2012 9 44.2 139 Yes Ghana Management + Accounting + Planning components trained

Graph of Effects

This graph shows the effects of [Number of Evaluations] evaluations of [Program Type] programs. The first evaluation, [Evaluation name 1], estimated an effect of [Estimated effect Eval. 1] points (graphed with the top grey circle). Because this is an estimate, there is uncertainty about what the true effect is. But we know that the true effect will probably lie between a low value of [True effect lie between – Low value, Eval. 1] and a high value of [True effect lie between – High value, Eval. 1] (graphed with the top horizontal line). We can combine the estimates from all the evaluations and compute an average effect of [Estimated effect, Average] (graphed with the black circle). There is also uncertainty about where the true average effect is. But we know that the true average effect probably lies between [True effect lie between – Low value, Average] and [True effect lie between – High value, Average] points (graphed with the bottom horizontal line).
Evaluation Effects Low Value High Value Weight in Average Effect (%)
Alibhai 2019 ii 4 -18 25 4
Bruhn 2013 1 -9 12 14
Bulte 2017 13 7 19 31
del Mel 2014 -11 -50 28 1
Fairlie 2015 8 -1 17 18
Klinger 2011 47 16 77 2
Mano 2012 9 3 15 30
Overall