Policy Challenge
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
Program Type
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
8
2
5
Learning In Primary
Incentivos monetarios para alumnos (sLP)
16
0
Evaluación Efecto Edad promedio Observaciones Evaluación experimental País Intervención
Jepsen 2009 3 Grado 3 196,533 No Estados Unidos Reducción del tamaño de la clase de 25 a 20 alumnos
Duflo 2012 3 Grado 2 6,533 Si Kenia Reducción del tamaño de la clase de 25 a 20 alumnos
Krueger 1999 14 Preprimaria 6,452 Si Estados Unidos Reducción del tamaño de la clase de 25 a 20 alumnos
Urquiola 2006 18 Grado 3 3,594 No Bolivia Reducción del tamaño de la clase de 25 a 20 alumnos
Angrist 1999 9 Grado 4 2,997 No Israel Reducción del tamaño de la clase de 25 a 20 alumnos
Hoxby 2000 -1 Grado 3 1,752 No Estados Unidos Reducción del tamaño de la clase de 25 a 20 alumnos

Graph of Effects

This graph shows the effects of [Number of Evaluations] evaluations of [Program Type] programs. The first evaluation, [Evaluation name 1], estimated an effect of [Estimated effect Eval. 1] points (graphed with the top grey circle). Because this is an estimate, there is uncertainty about what the true effect is. But we know that the true effect will probably lie between a low value of [True effect lie between – Low value, Eval. 1] and a high value of [True effect lie between – High value, Eval. 1] (graphed with the top horizontal line). We can combine the estimates from all the evaluations and compute an average effect of [Estimated effect, Average] (graphed with the black circle). There is also uncertainty about where the true average effect is. But we know that the true average effect probably lies between [True effect lie between – Low value, Average] and [True effect lie between – High value, Average] points (graphed with the bottom horizontal line).
Evaluación Efectos Valor Mínimo Valor Máximo Peso en el efecto promedio (%)
Angrist 1999 9 2 17 13
Duflo 2012 3 -3 9 16
Hoxby 2000 -1 -4 2 21
Jepsen 2009 3 3 3 24
Krueger 1999 14 10 18 20
Urquiola 2006 18 6 31 7
Overall