Policy Challenge
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
Program Type
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
9
3
5
Learning In Primary
Enseñanza en grupos pequeños (sLP)
16
2
Evaluación Efecto Edad promedio Observaciones Evaluación experimental País Intervención
Banerjee 2007 ii 19 Grado 4 11,255 Si India Los alumnos usaron software de matemática 2 horas por semana (1 fuera del horario escolar)
Mo 2013 16 Grado 4 3,592 Si China Los alumnos usaron software de matemática durante 2 sesiones semanales de 40 minutos
Lai 2013 i 12 Grado 4 2,613 Si China Los alumnos usaron software de matemática durante 2 sesiones semanales de 40 minutos
Lai 2015 16 Grado 3 2,425 Si China Los alumnos usaron software de matemática durante 2 sesiones semanales de 40 minutos
Lai 2013 ii 21 Grado 3 1,717 Si China Los alumnos usaron software de lectura durante 2 sesiones semanales de 40 minutos
Linden 2008 ii 25 Grado 3 1,114 Si India Los alumnos resolvieron ejercicios de matemática en las computadoras 1 hora diariamente

Graph of Effects

This graph shows the effects of [Number of Evaluations] evaluations of [Program Type] programs. The first evaluation, [Evaluation name 1], estimated an effect of [Estimated effect Eval. 1] points (graphed with the top grey circle). Because this is an estimate, there is uncertainty about what the true effect is. But we know that the true effect will probably lie between a low value of [True effect lie between – Low value, Eval. 1] and a high value of [True effect lie between – High value, Eval. 1] (graphed with the top horizontal line). We can combine the estimates from all the evaluations and compute an average effect of [Estimated effect, Average] (graphed with the black circle). There is also uncertainty about where the true average effect is. But we know that the true average effect probably lies between [True effect lie between – Low value, Average] and [True effect lie between – High value, Average] points (graphed with the bottom horizontal line).
Evaluación Efectos Valor Mínimo Valor Máximo Peso en el efecto promedio (%)
Banerjee 2007 ii 19 5 33 10
Lai 2013 i 12 4 20 27
Lai 2013 ii 21 11 31 18
Lai 2015 16 6 26 18
Linden 2008 ii 25 -3 54 2
Mo 2013 16 7 25 25
Overall