Policy Challenge
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
Program Type
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
5
4
4
Enrollment In Secondary
Transferencias no condicionadas (sES)
8
2
Evaluación Efecto Edad promedio Observaciones Evaluación experimental País Intervención
Edmonds 2012 6 Grado 8 N/A Si Ecuador Madres recibieron $19 mensualmente sin condiciones
Pellerano 2014 6 15 2,223 Si Lesotho Los hogares recibieron $36-$75 trimestralmente sin condiciones
Cameron 2009 2 Grado 7 582 Si Indonesia Los alumnos recibieron transferencias mensuales de $4,83-$12 sin condiciones
Miller 2012 10 17 167 Si Malaui Las familias recibieron $16 mensualmente, además se pagó $3,31 por niño

Graph of Effects

This graph shows the effects of [Number of Evaluations] evaluations of [Program Type] programs. The first evaluation, [Evaluation name 1], estimated an effect of [Estimated effect Eval. 1] points (graphed with the top grey circle). Because this is an estimate, there is uncertainty about what the true effect is. But we know that the true effect will probably lie between a low value of [True effect lie between – Low value, Eval. 1] and a high value of [True effect lie between – High value, Eval. 1] (graphed with the top horizontal line). We can combine the estimates from all the evaluations and compute an average effect of [Estimated effect, Average] (graphed with the black circle). There is also uncertainty about where the true average effect is. But we know that the true average effect probably lies between [True effect lie between – Low value, Average] and [True effect lie between – High value, Average] points (graphed with the bottom horizontal line).
Evaluación Efectos Valor Mínimo Valor Máximo Peso en el efecto promedio (%)
Cameron 2009 2 1 3 46
Edmonds 2012 6 3 9 29
Miller 2012 10 2 18 11
Pellerano 2014 6 0 12 14
Overall