Policy Challenge
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
Program Type
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
6
4
5
Completing Secondary
Becas y premios (sCS)
9
2
Evaluación Efecto Edad promedio Observaciones Evaluación experimental País Intervención
Angrist 2009 7 Grado 12 3,821 Si Israel Los alumnos recibieron pagos por aprobar la prueba requerida para entrar en la universidad
Angrist 2006 6 Grado 10 3,542 Si Colombia Subsidios para asistir a escuelas privadas que cubrieron la inscripción y el pago mensual
Angrist 2002 8 Grado 10 1,304 Si Colombia Subsidios para asistir a escuelas privadas que cubrieron la inscripción y el pago mensual
Levitt 2016 -4 Grado 11 995 Si Estados Unidos Los alumnos o las familias recibieron pagos condicionados al desempeño
Edmonds 2014 9 13 438 Si Nepal Becas y estipendios mensuales condicionados a la asistencia escolar

Graph of Effects

This graph shows the effects of [Number of Evaluations] evaluations of [Program Type] programs. The first evaluation, [Evaluation name 1], estimated an effect of [Estimated effect Eval. 1] points (graphed with the top grey circle). Because this is an estimate, there is uncertainty about what the true effect is. But we know that the true effect will probably lie between a low value of [True effect lie between – Low value, Eval. 1] and a high value of [True effect lie between – High value, Eval. 1] (graphed with the top horizontal line). We can combine the estimates from all the evaluations and compute an average effect of [Estimated effect, Average] (graphed with the black circle). There is also uncertainty about where the true average effect is. But we know that the true average effect probably lies between [True effect lie between – Low value, Average] and [True effect lie between – High value, Average] points (graphed with the bottom horizontal line).
Evaluación Efectos Valor Mínimo Valor Máximo Peso en el efecto promedio (%)
Angrist 2002 8 4 12 22
Angrist 2006 6 4 8 29
Angrist 2009 7 1 13 14
Edmonds 2014 9 5 13 20
Levitt 2016 -4 -10 2 15
Overall