Policy Challenge
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
Program Type
Path 2 Copy Created with Sketch.
2
3
3
Enrollment In Secondary
Counseling, coaching and information (eES)
6
-2
Evaluation Effect Average Age Observations Experimental Evaluation Country Intervention
Loyalka 2013 -2 Grade 7 11,633 Yes China Training for teachers and principals on giving career planning lessons
Jensen 2010 4 Grade 8 2,241 Yes Dominican Republic Students were informed about returns to education
Goux 2015 5 Grade 8 1,130 Yes France Principals discussed with families their childrens choice of track

Graph of Effects

This graph shows the effects of [Number of Evaluations] evaluations of [Program Type] programs. The first evaluation, [Evaluation name 1], estimated an effect of [Estimated effect Eval. 1] points (graphed with the top grey circle). Because this is an estimate, there is uncertainty about what the true effect is. But we know that the true effect will probably lie between a low value of [True effect lie between – Low value, Eval. 1] and a high value of [True effect lie between – High value, Eval. 1] (graphed with the top horizontal line). We can combine the estimates from all the evaluations and compute an average effect of [Estimated effect, Average] (graphed with the black circle). There is also uncertainty about where the true average effect is. But we know that the true average effect probably lies between [True effect lie between – Low value, Average] and [True effect lie between – High value, Average] points (graphed with the bottom horizontal line).
Evaluation Effects Low Value High Value Weight in Average Effect (%)
Goux 2015 5 1 9 30
Jensen 2010 4 0 8 30
Loyalka 2013 -2 -3 -1 39
Overall