| Evaluation | Effect | Average Age | Observations | Experimental Evaluation | Country | Intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baez 2011 | 5 | 16 | 816,038 | No | Colombia | Monthly transfers of $18 conditional on school attendance |
| Glewwe 2012 | 0 | Grade 7 | 182,006 | Yes | Brazil | Monthly payments conditional on school enrollment and attendance |
| Heinrich 2005 | 5 | Grade 8 | N/A | No | Argentina | Annual payment of $192 conditional on attendance and grade progression |
| Dubois 2012 | 3 | Grade 8 | 27,788 | Yes | Mexico | Monthly $34-$41 transfers conditional on school attendance |
| Barrera-Osorio 2015 | 1 | Grade 9 | 10,947 | Yes | Colombia | Students received bimonthly transfers conditional on attendance |
| de Brauw 2015 | 4 | Grade 10 | 6,056 | No | Brazil | Transfers to households conditional on school attendance |
| Dearden 2009 | 7 | Grade 12 | 3,803 | No | United Kingdom | Students received weekly payments, retention and achievement bonuses |
| Zavakou 2011 | 0 | Grade 10 | 2,347 | No | Colombia | Monthly $18 transfer conditional on school attendance |
| Barrera-Osorio 2011 | 4 | Grade 9 | 529 | Yes | Colombia | Students received bimonthly transfers conditional on attendance |
| Behrman 2005 | -3 | Grade 8 | 208 | Yes | Mexico | Monthly $77 transfers conditional on regular school attendance |
Graph of Effects
This graph shows the effects of [Number of Evaluations] evaluations of [Program Type] programs. The first evaluation, [Evaluation name 1], estimated an effect of [Estimated effect Eval. 1] points (graphed with the top grey circle). Because this is an estimate, there is uncertainty about what the true effect is. But we know that the true effect will probably lie between a low value of [True effect lie between – Low value, Eval. 1] and a high value of [True effect lie between – High value, Eval. 1] (graphed with the top horizontal line). We can combine the estimates from all the evaluations and compute an average effect of [Estimated effect, Average] (graphed with the black circle). There is also uncertainty about where the true average effect is. But we know that the true average effect probably lies between [True effect lie between – Low value, Average] and [True effect lie between – High value, Average] points (graphed with the bottom horizontal line).
| Evaluation | Effects | Low Value | High Value | Weight in Average Effect (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baez 2011 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 16 |
| Barrera-Osorio 2011 | 4 | -1 | 9 | 7 |
| Barrera-Osorio 2015 | 1 | -1 | 3 | 14 |
| Behrman 2005 | -3 | -8 | 2 | 7 |
| de Brauw 2015 | 4 | -7 | 15 | 2 |
| Dearden 2009 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 13 |
| Dubois 2012 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 16 |
| Glewwe 2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| Heinrich 2005 | 5 | -1 | 11 | 6 |
| Zavakou 2011 | 0 | -12 | 12 | 2 |
| Overall |